Opponent analysis

I'm playing Team 4 this week; he got Tomlinson in the first round. We have 12 teams in three divisions of 4 teams. We play each of the other 11 teams once and two of the teams from the division a second time. This is the one team from my division I only play once. Let's hope he's one of the better teams in the division.

QBs: Philip Rivers, SD, Chris Redman, Atl, Rex Grossman, Chi.
Since Rivers is the only starter, I'm guessing he'll be the only QB playing. I certainly like my chances matching Hasselbeck against Rivers.
RBs: Ladanian Tomlinson, SD, Justin Fargas, Oak, Jerious Norwood, Atl, Brandon Jackson, GB.
Not a terribly impressive collection. I'm going to assume he'll go Tomlinson and Fargas. I like my two guys to win this position.
WRs: Anquan Boldin, Az, Plaxico Burress, NYG, Chad Johnson, Cin, Vincent Jackson, SD, David Patten, NO, Antwaan Randle-El, Was, Bobby Engram, Sea
Obviously he's got more good WRs than I. I'd guess he'll play Boldin, Buress, and Jackson. That means my second QB has to only out-perform one of these guys for me to win the flex spot. I'll probably lose the WRs, but I think I'll be close enough that I'm pretty confident so far.
TEs: Chris Cooley, Was, Gregg Olsen, Chi, Leonard Pope, Az
I don't understand drafting 3 TEs; he'll never play more than one, Cooley should play every week except his bye, and then one other TE suffices. Cooley probably beats Daniels, but not by a huge amount.
PKs: Olindo Mare, Sea, Lawrence Tynes, NYG
Tynes is hurt this week, so it'll be Mare. It means every TD for Hasselbeck is only worth five to me. However, I like Gostkowski over Mare and I don't like drafting two PKs.
TMs: Carolina Panthers, Car
They play SD, so his QB and #1 RB. That is the opposite of synergy.

All in all, I like my chances this week. I really do hope he's one of the better teams in the division, but that's not very likely.